Why religion is the product of faggotry.

This article in Greek. Thank you to Heretic Republic.

First, I should define what I mean by the strong term “faggotry.” By this I do not mean homosexuality proper. Rather, I use it to describe the twisting and perversion in the mind of a religious person caused by repressed homosexuality. Being forced to deny a fundamental aspect of oneself by persecution and threats of ostracism, or worse, can lead one to a very dark place. The faggot must live in constant self-denial and self-doubt. If he lives in a society which considers homosexuality as a sin or a disease, he will feel a strong self-hatred. In a weak-willed individual, it will remain self-hatred: in a strong-willed individual it must necessarily turn into hatred of others, by projection.

This lays the basis of an understanding of religion. There are three fundamental characteristics of monotheistic religions like Christianity that clearly fit this model:

1. Constant projection of undesired attributes on one’s opponents.

For those people who are strong-willed enough to promote their religion, their self-hatred must necessarily be projected as hatred of others, especially one’s religious enemies. And so Christians accuse atheists of wanting to escape morality, of being relativists, of being illogical, of refusing to listen to their conscience, of being arrogant, of being intolerant, when in fact it is the Christian who suffers from all these flaws. But what they hate in themselves, they must project it onto others in order to be able to live with themselves and not look at themselves.

2. Hatred of the body, sexuality in general, and female sexuality.

3. Even greater hatred of homosexuality.

These two points go without saying. Faggots hate their own body, hate their sexuality, and hate homosexuality as a concept. Thus it is no surprise that Christianity has an anti-homosexuality fetish and has held an anti-woman ideology for centuries. The strong anti-abortion fetish must also find its roots here: for faggots, babies are a constant “proof” to others that they are not faggots and their ticket to permanent acceptance, but abortion represents the eradication of such “proof.” Thus abortion represents, to them, an attack against their most powerful tool of validation.

The belief in salvation through belief may not seem related, but fits the fag profile. Faggots believe that they were cursed from birth (and project this into the belief that we are all cursed from birth, “original sin”) and hate themselves and long for a time when they will be accepted and loved for who they are. They see their homosexuality as a perversion that cannot be cured physically or mentally, but only spiritually. Human beings cannot accept them as they are, but God can and will, after they die. This gives them a sense of “ultimate happiness,” which can only be achieved in Heaven. Their personal lives are, of course, hellish, and therefore they project the belief that everyone’s earthly life is hellish and without joy, that no material goods can compete with the relief they get from believing in God.

I believe that Christianity itself has as a founding figure a flaming faggot (Jesus, who lived constantly with 12 other men, asked them to symbolically eat and drink his body, loathed his mother, and threw hissy fits at moneychangers and fig trees) and was actually founded by a faggot (Paul of Tarsus), or so some secular historians believe. Whether this is true or not, it is well-known that Christianity is promoted by a great number of faggots, many of which are exposed as time goes on.

Please understand that I am not saying that all Christians are faggots. Obviously, only a minority of them must be such. But they do follow the faggot mentality exhibited by their leaders and intellectual past, they follow a faggot ideology. All monotheistic religions are of this nature. Here is a page about Jehovah’s Witnesses leaders and homosexuality. And it is not restricted to monotheism either. For instance, it has been proven that the most worshipped Hindu guru in the world, Sathya Sai Baba, sexually molests young boys: his belief system is very fundamentalist and also downgrades women and sex.

Think of the term “drama queen.” This is a homosexual stereotype. But who in real life exemplifies this stereotype, if not fundamentalist Christians? They way in which they obsess about their “persecution” borders on mental disease. Everything around them, books, movies, even little children’s show characters, is persecuting them. They confuse fiction, satire, metaphors and reality. They are obsessed about being persecuted, like faggots.

Faggotry is not restricted to religious doctrines and attitudes proper. Look at spanking, for instance. Some Christians still promote corporal punishment of this sort. And we know that spanking is a sexual stimulant. Certainly the idea of a grown man spanking his young son has a homosexual component, even if it remains implicit.

Another area of faggotry is gender-segregated groups or clubs, such as the Catholic priesthood. In those groups, homosexual behaviour tends to flourish because it is the only outlet to sexual expression, and it could be argued that gender-segregated education was constructed in order to promote homosexuality in growing children (as it was believed until recently that homosexuality was inculcated, not genetic). But in the case of the priesthood, where brotherhood is relatively absent, this has historically, and still today, been manifested by sexual perversion of many kinds.

Gender segregation is not a sufficient condition to detect the expression of faggotry. For instance, we know that gender-segregated sports are not the result of faggotry because the sex act cannot be involved during the period of time during which genders are fully segregated (the performance itself), or the people involved have easy access to members of the opposite gender (before or after the performance). Rather, it is clear that such segregation is made in order to ensure fairness for males and females, who have different body structures and thus perform at different levels in the same sport.

Machoism is also definitely fag in nature. Jokes about butt-patting during football games aside, it is clear that machoism, with its emphasis on gender segregation, male bonding, admiration of men and objectification of women, is a fag way of life.

Why do faggots tend to monopolize the religious arena? I believe that sexual expression is so fundamental to the human psyche that repression of that energy creates zealots far more easily than any other method. And thus, faggots tend to dominate the field because they have unbounded zeal and self-hatred, which they channel into fanatical pursuits like religion and politics.

Sissy men obsess about being the “bridesmaid of Christ” and being a “virgin for God.” Sissy men fall on their knees for whoreship (total submission to a male figure, symbolizing giving oral sex to a male figure). Real men stand on their own two feet and reject Christianity and its faggot ideology.

44 thoughts on “Why religion is the product of faggotry.

  1. bobkaercher December 7, 2007 at 00:46

    LOL!!! Francois, I think it would be a fairly accurate prediction to say you won’t be published by Lew Rockwell again. The headline of your post alone practically had me laughing my ass off so hard I almost fell off the couch.

  2. Francois Tremblay December 7, 2007 at 00:52

    What about the fact that I always call him Jew Rockwell? ;)

  3. bobkaercher December 7, 2007 at 11:42


  4. alleee December 8, 2007 at 10:48

    Thanks for writing a succinct article on what I have been saying to you for years, ;) only without such cohesion.

  5. lsj521 December 8, 2007 at 20:40


  6. Francois Tremblay December 8, 2007 at 21:41

    lsj51, I see you smile. Any comments in particular? ;)

  7. Carnival of the Godless December 9, 2007 at 02:07

    […] Tremblay delivers a controversial, humorous blog about religion being the product of faggotry. There are three fundamental characteristics of monotheistic religions like Christianity that […]

  8. co2000 December 28, 2007 at 03:01

    Sai Baba is NOT homosexual and does NOT molest young bos or anybody else. You are the unwitting pawn of white supremacists and evangelical Christians. There are no legal entities backing the drivel about Sai Baba being a sexual abuser. If you look at the facts you will see a bunch of ADULT white males are claiming they were “abused” by Sai Baba. Yet, not ONE of them has EVER even tried to file charges. Several of them claim Sai Baba is a fraud while simultaneously claiming his genitalia supernaturally morphed from male to female. Are you smart enough to see the problem with this picture? Anybody can say anything on the interent and a lot of dummies will believe it. Please use somw common sense and realize REAL sexual abuse victims go tot he police or file lawsuits and WIN. They do not whine on the internet for years on end and play to ignorant journalists who have watched to many Hollyweird movies, believe anything they hear and miserably fail to check their facts.



  9. Francois Tremblay December 28, 2007 at 03:48

    What in the hell are you talking about? I read about many different complaints against Sai Baba, and none of them talked about morphing genitalia or adult white males (in fact I don’t recall any such claim made by adult white males- those males do discuss the charges leveled by Indian children, but they don’t claim they themselves have been abused).

  10. co2000 December 28, 2007 at 07:49

    Statements like yours are EXACTLY the reason laynmen shouldn’t try to play law enforcement.You see only what your biased mind wants to see.

    Read it and weep at your ignorance:

    I’ve done five years worth of research into these suspicious, racist allegations and like I said NO legal entities are backing them.

  11. Francois Tremblay December 28, 2007 at 14:59

    And policemen and judges do not “see only what [their] based mind wants to see”?

    Man, are you wrong on that one.

    I recommend you rent “Capturing the Friedmen” and see how unbiased policemen and judges are.

  12. Francois Tremblay December 28, 2007 at 15:02

    And stop spamming links from Sai Baba web sites or I will block you. I am not interested in knowing what that ugly little troll has to say for himself.

  13. […] April, 2008 It is obvious that Christianity is a religion based on faggotry. However, other religions also have varying degrees of faggotry. How do we figure it out, how do […]

  14. […] ribbons, Freedom for the powerful, justice for the rich, Governed by lies and fear. O land of the faggots, home of the […]

  15. thusspokebelinsky May 26, 2008 at 23:33

    I don’t know if you were just joking around, Francois, but I found your neo-Freudian account (not that there’s anything wrong with Freud!) to be lacking empirical evidence, much like a great deal of Freud’s claims, which were based on isolated case studies and Freud’s personal conjectures rather than solid science. I’m an atheist (as I gather you are), but I think there are a lot better theories for the origins of religion and many of its practices…

  16. Francois Tremblay May 27, 2008 at 00:10

    1. I am not joking around. I do not imply this at all in my entry.
    2. I never claimed that the faggotry theory explains the “origins of religion.” Nowhere in my entry do I make this claim.

    These two points together seem to indicate that you have reading comprehension problems.

  17. Anarcho-pragmatiste May 27, 2008 at 15:50

    Is the word “faggotry” is for you a synonym of “Homophobia”?

  18. Anarcho-pragmatiste May 27, 2008 at 15:59

    En français, pourrait-on le traduire par “faux-virils”?

  19. Francois Tremblay May 27, 2008 at 17:38

    Oui, c’est a peu pres ca. Homophobia caused by being a closeted gay. Ils utilisent leur frustration sexuelle pour combattre l’homosexualite, comme beaucoup de politiciens conservateurs ou pasteurs qui sont decouverts plus tard.

  20. Anarcho-pragmatiste May 27, 2008 at 17:48

    Mais je préfère “faux-viril” dans votre contexte.

  21. Francois Tremblay May 27, 2008 at 17:49

    Est-ce que je peux t’engager comme traducteur? ;)

  22. Anarcho-pragmatiste May 27, 2008 at 17:52

    Bof, je ne suis pas si bon que ça!

  23. Francois Tremblay May 27, 2008 at 17:55

    Mais meilleur que moi, sans doute. Comme j’ai dit auparavent, je crois que j’ai perdu beaucoup de mon francais.

  24. […] immaturity is also related to faggotry in matters of relationships and sexuality. The immature mind sees sexuality as something […]

  25. […] love and control during these past months. I’ve also talked about the issues of machoism (the faggot mentality), the manichean worldview, and hierarchies. I believe that all these elements come together once we […]

  26. John Doe March 11, 2009 at 13:54

    Sounds to me like a bunch of hogwash unsupported by facts or common sense. Here, let me give it a try: Anarchists are those who liked to have “Mummy” stick her finger stuck up their arses when they were toddlers. Unfortunately, Mummy stopped it when they turned 3 years old. Unable to continue to have Mummy pleasure them, they turned toward theoretical anarchist bullshit that nobody in their right mind believes, and they sit around laughing at everybody else who doesn’t buy into their leftist bullshit.

    Wow, this is easy. Make shit up, put absolutely no real thought into it, and VOILA! Just declare that I am right and you are wrong. Careful, Francois, I can write your articles better than you.

  27. Francois Tremblay March 11, 2009 at 15:55

    I don’t really understand how your parody is relevant to my entry, John. My entry didn’t concern itself with why people become statists or what events in their childhood made them do so. In fact, what I talk about has nothing to do with the reasons why people are statists. So your comment is just absurd with no point.

  28. omadeon April 19, 2009 at 09:59

    Your posting stirred up quot a bit of laughter among some of my open-minded libertarian Greek friends, dear Mr. Tremblay.

    As a result,
    1) Your posting will be added to the special links’ section of my today’s post (titled “Celebration of a Religion of Love, founded on HATE”).
    2) You are to be added in my English blogs blog-roll (in a few minutes).

    Keep up the very good work! :)

  29. omadeon April 19, 2009 at 10:09

    quot->quite (sorry)

  30. […] A well-written hilarious account of Christianity as a religion associated with (or even caused by) repressed homosexuality, written by a Mr. Francois Tremblay in 2007 (and is always relevant) is “Why religion is the product of faggotry.“ […]

  31. Francois Tremblay April 19, 2009 at 14:57

    Thank you very much for the compliment. I wish I could read Greek!

  32. O Αιρετικός - The Heretic April 26, 2009 at 05:16

    I loved it so much that I made a post in Greek for my own blog, based on yours (and, of course, I clearly mention whose post my own blasphemous work is based on). It’s titled “Θρησκεία: η πούστικη ιδεολογία” (translation: “Religion: the faggoty ideology”) and it’s here: http://hereticrepublic-gr.blogspot.com/2009/04/blog-post_24.html

    I’m pretty sure this ought to annoy the religious nuts in my country.

  33. Francois Tremblay April 26, 2009 at 05:30

    Thank you, I’m glad you loved it. I added a link to your version at the top.

  34. Francois Tremblay April 26, 2009 at 05:31

    By the way, how’s the revolution going in Greece? Has anything progressed yet?

  35. O Αιρετικός - The Heretic April 26, 2009 at 07:25

    What revolution? The only way Greece can be saved is by waiting until EVERYONE over 40 dies and then re-educating a new generation and training it to respect itself and face life with dignity.

  36. […] 2. Why religion is the product of faggotry. […]

  37. Sam May 5, 2010 at 12:57

    Why do you hate Jews and homosexuals? Considering you take a lot of your ideas on unlimited economic growth straight from the mouth of Noam Chomsky, a Jew. Reminds me of how Wagner took the ideas of Mendelssohn and then slighted him in the press.

    • Francois Tremblay May 5, 2010 at 16:47

      Whaaa? Since when do I hate Jews and homosexuals?

      And what the hell is “unlimited economic growth”? I’ve never, ever said such a thing.

  38. […] stronger than when we look at the heteronormative hatred for most forms of love. If we look at the faggots who run our society and the faggots who support them, they hate all relationships which are not […]

  39. […] it to the religion itself. To a certain extent this is true, but only insofar as Catholicism is a faggot religion. It is not a coincidence that the earliest records of priests’ crimes included sexually […]

  40. […] Again, where have we heard these traits before? That’s right.. the truth is, “men’s rights” activists (MRAs) are faggots! […]

  41. WorkingClassAsshole November 7, 2011 at 22:28

    Christians, Jews, and Muslims will meet their holocaust in the next world war. Good riddance. Holding us back with their moral bullshit and ethics like all the liberal socialists running this world. IN FACT, all religious nutsacks are socialist dicks! KEEP YOUR BIG BROTHER “GOD” OFF MY LIFE.

  42. […] have already explained this phenomenon. Christianity is a faggot ideology, meaning that it is based on the active self-repression of homosexuality. This is proven by the […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: