Christopher Hitchens v waterboarding: water wins.

Christopher Hitchens decided to try waterboarding for himself, to report if it is or isn’t torture. I’m not going to give it away… (okay, it’s torture)

You may have read by now the official lie about this treatment, which is that it “simulates” the feeling of drowning. This is not the case. You feel that you are drowning because you are drowning—or, rather, being drowned, albeit slowly and under controlled conditions and at the mercy (or otherwise) of those who are applying the pressure. The “board” is the instrument, not the method. You are not being boarded. You are being watered. This was very rapidly brought home to me when, on top of the hood, which still admitted a few flashes of random and worrying strobe light to my vision, three layers of enveloping towel were added. In this pregnant darkness, head downward, I waited for a while until I abruptly felt a slow cascade of water going up my nose. Determined to resist if only for the honor of my navy ancestors who had so often been in peril on the sea, I held my breath for a while and then had to exhale and—as you might expect—inhale in turn. The inhalation brought the damp cloths tight against my nostrils, as if a huge, wet paw had been suddenly and annihilatingly clamped over my face. Unable to determine whether I was breathing in or out, and flooded more with sheer panic than with mere water, I triggered the pre-arranged signal and felt the unbelievable relief of being pulled upright and having the soaking and stifling layers pulled off me. I find I don’t want to tell you how little time I lasted.

[I]f waterboarding does not constitute torture, then there is no such thing as torture.

A very interesting thing happened: after this experience, Hitchens wrote some things that are… well, not very Hitchenesque:

One used to be told—and surely with truth—that the lethal fanatics of al-Qaeda were schooled to lie, and instructed to claim that they had been tortured and maltreated whether they had been tortured and maltreated or not. Did we notice what a frontier we had crossed when we admitted and even proclaimed that their stories might in fact be true? I had only a very slight encounter on that frontier, but I still wish that my experience were the only way in which the words “waterboard” and “American” could be mentioned in the same (gasping and sobbing) breath.

4 thoughts on “Christopher Hitchens v waterboarding: water wins.

  1. kentmcmanigal July 26, 2008 at 22:23

    I don’t feel like researching this myself, but did I read somewhere that after WWII, Japanese soldiers were executed for having conducted waterboard torture?

  2. […] Christopher Hitchens vs Waterboarding: Waters Wins   by Francois Tremblay […]

  3. AlexanderQA February 20, 2010 at 00:22

    Хочу увлечь своего ребенка фехтованием. Ему сейчас 6 лет. Кто-нибудь знает хороший ресурс?

  4. kiliunsuh September 24, 2011 at 18:37

    Guy .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds alsoI am happy to seek out numerous helpful info right here within the put up, we want develop more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: