And why the “anarcho”-capitalists don’t have any… (human decency, that is)
Consider the sexual harassment which continually occurs between a secretary and a boss . . . while objectionable to many women, [it] is not a coercive action. It is rather part of a package deal in which the secretary agrees to all aspects of the job when she agrees to accept the job, and especially when she agrees to keep the job. The office is, after all, private property. The secretary does not have to remain if the ‘coercion’ is objectionable.
That’s it, isn’t it? It’s the voluntaryist fallacy. That’s what turns these reasonable people into monsters. Whatever is not “coercive” according to property theory is therefore just fine, and you can love it or leave it. That’s exactly the same reasoning that statists use to defend the nation-state.
Voluntaryism and “anarcho”-capitalism have to be exposed and demolished as the evil ideologies that they really are.
Thanks to division by zero.