Liberals and funfems: you are killing women!

rmott62, an ex-prostituted woman, tells liberals and funfems: your beliefs kill women! Stop using “kindness” to prevent yourself from speaking against pornstitution!

I feel heart-broken and like screaming my head off – as more and more societies are seeing the way to “help” the prostituted is legalise brothels and other methods of indoors prostitution.

This is so deluded and dangerous.

It is partly based on dividing the “good” and “bad” prostituted woman.

The “bad” prostitute will be on the street, possibly highly damaged from being a prostitute from a very young age, she may be damaged coz she was raped as a child. She will live a chaotic life-style, and be addicted to drugs. She is beaten and controlled by pimps (who of course must be Black and dressed as a Pimp).

The “bad” prostitute cannot be helped, she is too lost – well that a convenient excuse for keeping her as sub-human and refusing to see her human rights.

The “good” prostitute has enter prostitution as some form of empowered choice, and has the power and freedom to control how the punters treat her. She will do for the money and the thrill – and of course she can leave at any time on her terms. She works indoors usually as an escort or girlfriend experience.

Of course, the reality is that both these extremes of what is to be a prostitute are just invented by the sex trade and its apologists. Look into my descriptions and there is no real woman there – just a cartoon image taken from porn.

7 thoughts on “Liberals and funfems: you are killing women!

  1. David Gendron March 11, 2013 at 11:30

    But there is even more “bad” prostitutes right now…

  2. luna920 March 11, 2013 at 19:36

    A Few Questions:

    1. Do you think male prostitution should be banned or not?
    2. Since (as I far as I can still tell) you consider yourself an anarchist, how would you stop prostitution from occurring without a centralized state?
    3.As a followup to that, what would you do to johns who were caught?
    4. Even though you favour the Swedish position on prostitution, let me ask you hypothetically that if you had to choose between a system as was (is?) the one in America where prostitutes compromise the majority of those targeted by law enforcement versus decriminalization favoured by so-called funfems and others which would you decide on?

    • Francois Tremblay March 11, 2013 at 19:44

      “1. Do you think male prostitution should be banned or not?”
      I think johns and pimps of males should be prosecuted too, yes.

      “2. Since (as I far as I can still tell) you consider yourself an anarchist, how would you stop prostitution from occurring without a centralized state?”
      That’s a silly question. How would you stop murder from occurring without a centralized state? Obviously the answer is the same as for any other crime: so your answer will be found in this entry- https://francoistremblay.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/who-would-replace-the-police/

      “3.As a followup to that, what would you do to johns who were caught?”
      *I* wouldn’t do anything to them. If you’re asking what should be done to johns in an egalitarian justice system, I haven’t the faintest idea. Presumably it would involve teaching them to treat women as their equals, instead of sex objects. I don’t know how this would be accomplished.

      “4. Even though you favour the Swedish position on prostitution, let me ask you hypothetically that if you had to choose between a system as was (is?) the one in America where prostitutes compromise the majority of those targeted by law enforcement versus decriminalization favoured by so-called funfems and others which would you decide on?”
      That’s a terrible question. I have no preference… they both lead to the exploitation and death of women on a massive scale. I suppose I would have to choose decriminalization on the sheer basis that it gives the government less power to enforce and less power to imprison, but that’s a weak criterion.

    • Francois Tremblay March 12, 2013 at 12:55

      I agree but… her reasoning is based on the acceptance of gender rebellion being a mental disorder. I disagree that it’s a mental disorder. I think it’s normal and that we all do it to some extent.

      • David Gendron March 13, 2013 at 08:54

        Yeah, the GID thing is too much. This is not really a mental disorder.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: