Francois Tremblay, Mangina Extraordinaire!

So I got this incredibly, profoundly stupid comments a while ago. I spammed it immediately because it was ridiculously long. But it’s also very funny, so I thought I’d show you some quotes from this book-length MRA comment.

Here’s how the whole thing STARTS:

Ah, more misandric horseshit from Francois Tremblay, Mangina Extraordinaire. It is obvious that a woman came up with this list. At most either Francois was ghostwriting on her behalf by posting this, or she has been ghostwriting for him.

Did “Mark” at “” (probably not his real email address) really expect me to publish this comment? Also, I am too stupid to come up with a simple bullet point entry, but apparently smart enough to write the usual entries I post (or is my whole blog ghostwritten by a woman?).

Well, I’d love to know who this woman is so I can learn exactly how the hell she came to hold exactly the same positions as me, because so far I haven’t met anyone else who does… except my wife. Oh, she must be the one writing this blog! Mystery solved???

Anyway, here are some more highlights:

Funny how your entire spiel is about how women are in no way obligated to pleasure men, but men are obligated to pleasure women. Misandry and hypocritical feminist double-standards at their finest! If men are not entitled to sexual pleasure from women, why are women entitled to sexual pleasure from men? It seems that you (and/or the woman who dictated/wrote that above list) is/are sexually uneducated. Whether or not men are obligated to give women anything at all is up for debate. All depends on what that something is, a reasonable precondition being that it is something real. Men are under no obligation to provide women with the impossible, no more obligated to give a woman an orgasm than they are to give her a pet unicorn. Note that “female orgasm” is an oxymoron. The orgasm is nothing more than an evolutionary byproduct of the (male) ejaculation in mammals and other terrestrial vertebrates. And the clitoris is a useless appendage!


What do you propose we resort to if not porn? (I think it’s obvious that deep down you believe, like all the really hardcore feminists, that fundamentally ALL heterosexual intercourse is rape.) Would you prefer that men resort to REAL voyeurism, to spy on women in the toilet or changing room or other private areas? I presume not. So wouldn’t it be better if men resort to pornography. And furthermore, that does not even get into how one defines “pornography” to begin with! You say that men: “do not need pornography in order to masturbate any more than women do.” As stated above, women do not need to masturbate because women do not need to ejaculate. Men do.

And in my experience if women ever masturbate it’s out of morbid curiosity, so of course they don’t need pornography in order to masturbate! Of course, I realize that your opposition to pornography is on feminist grounds, namely that it “exploits women.” (Even amateur porn?) Okay, serious question: what are your thoughts on Hentai?

My thoughts on the matter, I am a strong proponent of the MGTOW ideology. I would not consider myself a masculinist, and, though I sympathize with the MRM, reject most of the manosphere seeing them for the thinly veiled FASCISTS that the lot of them are. And I absolutely loathe the PUA and Game community, despise them with a passion.

Feminism is determined to abolish the patriarchy (all well and good), but they want to replace an oppressive patriarchy with an oppressive matriarchy. I have no wish to replace one tyranny with another tyranny. No thank you!

It is obvious that the misandrist fake-anarchist mangina Francois Tremblay is a self-hating male. Might as well chop off his cock-and-balls, he doesn’t deserve them anyway!

This is some hilarious shit right there.

I also spared you a whole lengthy explanation of the alpha/beta/omega MRA conspiracy theory. Did he really think I have never heard of this bullshit? Oh boy.

8 thoughts on “Francois Tremblay, Mangina Extraordinaire!

  1. Heretic June 26, 2014 at 00:47

    “Would you prefer that men resort to REAL voyeurism, to spy on women in the toilet or changing room or other private areas? I presume not. So wouldn’t it be better if men resort to pornography.” Straight from the horse’s mouth! I have been saying for MONTHS how porn mags and videos were based off the voyeurism paraphilia. I’ll hold back on commenting on his other tired nonsense, but the blurb about his opinions is likewise deluded – as if a radfem or radfem ally would give a damn, and his rhetoric sounds just like MRAs. Grr, so annoyed.

  2. Francois Tremblay June 26, 2014 at 01:02

    Yes, I didn’t even pick up on that but you’re entirely right!

    But remember, the clitoris is a useless appendage. Like the appendix!

  3. Heretic June 26, 2014 at 01:16

    Somebody didn’t go to sex ed class. Haha, this dude is also saying you’re a TRAITOR to your own sex and need to have your man-card revoked!! Allying with radfems is a thought crime!

    • Francois Tremblay June 26, 2014 at 01:19

      Oh, I get that a lot. At work, when people see me read feminist books, they genuinely think that I shouldn’t do that because I am a man. And they don’t even know who it is I’m reading (every single person I’ve asked didn’t know who Andrea Dworkin was).

      It’s funny because they only know how to deal with women, so they have to think of me as a woman first before they can attack me. Male privilege is pretty bizarre.

  4. Heretic June 26, 2014 at 01:29

    Whoa, Dworkin thought of as a “feminazi” is bad enough. How ever do these types hold in their real feelings and thinly-veiled hatred until they get to the internet? I haven’t encountered misogynists like him IRL yet – I mean willing to say the same crap they post online. Maybe that’s a good thing.

    • Francois Tremblay June 26, 2014 at 01:32

      Well it is a good thing in that it reduces the possibility of outright harassment of women, but it’s a bad thing in that it hides the hatred that exists in society. But then again, all it takes is one rape or one murder for the misogynists to rear their ugly heads again and publicly declare how worthless women are, so… Maybe it doesn’t hide the hatred that well. :)

  5. AN June 27, 2014 at 12:30

    He had a lot of nerve attacking women’s human right to masturbate.

    • Francois Tremblay June 27, 2014 at 15:12

      Yea but since, as he said, there’s no such thing as the female orgasm and the clitoris is a useless appendage… :)

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: