Radical feminists might want to see this, if they haven’t seen this already.

I don’t know if I’ll ever talk about it, because I’m still trying to assimilate this information myself, and it’s probably a little too out there for most people, but if you’re a radical feminist, you may be interested in reading this series.

11 thoughts on “Radical feminists might want to see this, if they haven’t seen this already.

  1. Deep Thinking August 6, 2017 at 05:21 Reply

    Not a radical feminists, but very intereting. Thanks for posting.

  2. EGJ August 6, 2017 at 10:43 Reply

    Read it a while back. Explained a lot biologically speaking. Actually did some research about lots of hormones and their affects. However the idea that humans or life should continue was disappointing. Physics and astronomy beat biology. But overall extremely interesting, couldn’t stop till finished. Can’t wait for new ones.

    • Deep Thinking August 7, 2017 at 11:50 Reply

      Was there the idea that humans or life should continue? Seemed more the idea that the first humans or life to cease should be male.

  3. EGJ August 8, 2017 at 11:55 Reply

    Did you read entire thing? It’s ok to disagree. She talks about taking charge of gnome. That’s pure breeding speaking. And speaking into a future of lab babies..

    • Francois Tremblay August 8, 2017 at 16:18 Reply

      Gnome Chompsky?

    • Deep Thinking August 9, 2017 at 11:32 Reply

      Genome? As before: seemed more like women-need-to-take-charge-speaking; where women drive the future is a moot point.

  4. EGJ August 10, 2017 at 10:02 Reply

    As a women I need to take charge of my genome? I don’t need to do anything. I’m lucky to live in a part of a world where I can not care about it. My genes are worthless to me. All I wish is to live peacefully and couse minimum harm to others. I only respect people who spread this idea onto others and save them from needs, wants horror called organic life.

    • Francois Tremblay August 10, 2017 at 14:36 Reply

      Oh okay. Good. :)

      • Deep Thinking August 10, 2017 at 16:51 Reply

        The first world, per chance? Yay, feminism worked! :)

  5. EGJ August 11, 2017 at 10:44 Reply

    2.5 world as I see it. But I lived in first world most of my adult life. I grade first world for being more open minded (overall). See you can fix roads and stuff with foreign money but you cannot fix how they view weaker then themselves, especially kids, elderly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: