Trans activists planning to picket Day of Rememberance for Polytechnique massacre victims.

Am I kidding? Sadly, no.

Seriously? If you’re planning on picketing a Day of Rememberance for Polytechnique victims because you don’t like one of the speakers for being radfem, fuck you. That is the most horrible thing I’ve heard in a long time. What the fuck is wrong with you?

For all the times they call us scum, that’s pretty fucking scummy. Natalie Reed
 has no respect for human life.

40 thoughts on “Trans activists planning to picket Day of Rememberance for Polytechnique massacre victims.

  1. oopster74 November 21, 2013 at 13:14

    I’ve seen this reported on Gender Trender, without any evidence. I don’t believe it to be true, considering that this week is the Transgender Day of Remembrance, I think some people are telling porky pies.

    • Francois Tremblay November 21, 2013 at 13:17

      I don’t have Facebook, so I can’t check the source…

      • oopster74 November 21, 2013 at 13:18

        Don’t you think you should make that clear then?

        • Francois Tremblay November 21, 2013 at 13:22

          I think GenderTrender is a reliable source of information. She fights tirelessly against trans activists and their support of child abuse.

          • oopster74 November 21, 2013 at 13:24

            You shouldn’t blindly accept anything. Trans activists don’t want to abuse anyone, I don’t want to abuse anyone, but if I can help make things that little bit easier for the next generation of trans people, then I will. Wouldn’t you do the same thing?

        • Francois Tremblay November 21, 2013 at 13:29

          Don’t lie to me. I know what trans activists support.

          They support telling little children, even toddlers, that the fact that they rebel against their assigned gender (as if a toddler can have a gender!) means that they are the opposite gender, they support putting those children on invasive, untested medications to block their puberty, and then (when they’re adults) butchering their body so it “conforms” to the gender the child now believes they are because they’ve been indoctrinated for years and years at that point.

          The very minimum you can say about it, is that it’s child abuse. I call it a lot of other things too. And even if YOU don’t support it, a lot of trans activists do.

          • oopster74 November 21, 2013 at 13:32

            I’m not lying. A child can tell you whether they’re happy or not, and no child under 16/18 receives irreversible treatment. Would you say someone that needed a heart transplant would have to wait till they’re 18, or would you trust the medical people treating them?

        • Francois Tremblay November 21, 2013 at 13:37

          “I’m not lying. A child can tell you whether they’re happy or not, and no child under 16/18 receives irreversible treatment.”
          I never said otherwise. So what? By that time they’ve been thoroughly indoctrinated in the belief that they are another gender.

          “Would you say someone that needed a heart transplant would have to wait till they’re 18, or would you trust the medical people treating them?”
          How the fuck do you dare comparing butchering a person’s body for genderist beliefs with the need for a heart transplant. Are you serious right now?

          oopster74, I like having you on this blog and I usually appreciate your comments, but I suggest you stop this conversation right now if you care about commenting on this blog in the future.

          • oopster74 November 21, 2013 at 13:40

            Ok, I’ll add this and leave it.

            I knew nothing of genederist theory (or whatever it’s called). I had to figure things out for myself, with no one to talk to. Whatever I decided to do, it would have helped me so much to be able to talk things through, rather than have to be closeted for the early part oft life.

    • Francois Tremblay December 7, 2013 at 19:14

      By the way, asshole, the report was right.
      http://thearcticfeminist.wordpress.com/2013/12/03/montreal-massacre-memorial-conference-2013/
      “Although there was quite a bit of hype about a group of fringe “sex worker/trans ally” activists supposedly planning on disrupting the event. From what I saw there were about 6 of them, all men, who were completely ineffective.”
      You genderists are subhuman vermin.

  2. smash November 22, 2013 at 16:29

    Thanks for sharing this on your blog. Truly vile.

    • Francois Tremblay November 22, 2013 at 16:44

      Thanks! How come you don’t update your blog any more? I really liked it.

  3. mieprowan November 22, 2013 at 19:26

    Treating a seventeen year old with cross hormones after puberty blockers sterilizes the immature gonadal material and thusly constitutes irreversable treatment.

    • Francois Tremblay November 23, 2013 at 01:16

      To say the least.

    • oopster74 November 23, 2013 at 01:20

      What do you think not treating that 17 year old is going to do to their mental health?

      • Francois Tremblay November 23, 2013 at 01:22

        What do you think indoctrinating babies onwards about their gender roles, and repressing a toddler’s interests because ey’s not “performing” right, does to their mental health?

        • oopster74 November 23, 2013 at 02:36

          That’s not trans people doing that though, that’s society with blue for boys and pink for girls. By saying no to puberty blockers and then hormones, when the trans person is asking for them, you as guilty as those who enforce gender roles.

          • Francois Tremblay November 23, 2013 at 02:56

            “By saying no to puberty blockers and then hormones,”
            Actually, I am saying there’s no consent here, it’s wrong to do this to little children who not only cannot consent, but have been indoctrinated to not only believe that they have a gender (they don’t) but that they have the wrong one. Any pretense of consent at this point is idiotic.

            “when the trans person is asking for them,”
            Again, everyone is trans by definition. And if a CONSENTING ADULT wants to change their bodies, I have NOTHING against that, so don’t misrepresent what I say.

            “you as guilty as those who enforce gender roles.”
            Your sense of right and wrong must be pretty fucking skewed if you think demanding that consent be enforced deserves as much guilt as indoctrinating children without their consent. I have never given a child untested chemical treatments or indoctrinated him or her to believe that they need to have their own bodies butchered to fit my preconception of what they should look like. So fuck you for trying to make ME feel guilty, asshole.

          • Francois Tremblay November 23, 2013 at 02:58

            “That’s not trans people doing that though, that’s society with blue for boys and pink for girls.”
            Having the “choice” between living in one of two prison cells is not freedom any more than being assigned a prison cell. You’re still imprisoned, fuckwit!

            • oopster74 November 23, 2013 at 03:03

              You replied while I was replying and I lost my post.

              Anyway, if a child needs any medical treatment, the parent or guardian consents to it, not the child, so why should it be any different for trans kids? Look, given the choice, I wouldn’t choose to be trans, but I am, so I make the best of the situation. Life would have been so much better for me if I had someone I could talk to when I was a child about my gender issues, but I didn’t, and I was scared and alone and unhappy. I probably wouldn’t have been able to have hormone blockers when I was growing up in the 80’s, but just to know I wasn’t some kind of freak for feeling the way I did would have helped so much.

          • Francois Tremblay November 23, 2013 at 03:09

            “Anyway, if a child needs any medical treatment, the parent or guardian consents to it, not the child, so why should it be any different for trans kids?”
            Because being trans, again, is not actually a thing that exists?

            “Look, given the choice, I wouldn’t choose to be trans,”
            Again, we’re all trans. I keep having to repeat myself because you don’t seem to get it. NO ONE ACTUALLY PERFORMS EXACTLY LIKE THEIR ASSIGNED GENDER. NO ONE. Except in ads.

            • oopster74 November 23, 2013 at 03:15

              Trans is a real thing, I wouldn’t expect anyone who isn’t trans to understand it.

              If everyone is trans, we are trans to different degrees.

              Anyway, this is getting way off your original blog posting, so I’ll just say that anyone that disrespects any day of remembrance, is complete tool.

          • Francois Tremblay November 23, 2013 at 03:19

            “Trans is a real thing, I wouldn’t expect anyone who isn’t trans to understand it.”
            Well, oopster, you apparently know more about trans than major trans organizations, because I already discussed their definitions here:

            Genderism, trans theory and the hostility towards radical feminism.

            So, O gendergenius, if you disagree with them, why don’t YOU tell us what trans means then?

          • Francois Tremblay November 24, 2013 at 18:16

            Still waiting on your “real” definition of trans…

            • oopster74 November 24, 2013 at 18:34

              I’m not going to waste my time defining something you seem intent on simply dismissing. I thought you had an open mind, but appear to be as fixed in your thoughts as so many others.

          • Francois Tremblay November 24, 2013 at 18:36

            Yes, I do think you are an idiot for saying “trans” is a thing when YOUR OWN ORGANIZATIONS give definitions that apply to every person on this planet. And now you refuse to provide me with a new definition. So when you said “trans is a real thing,” you were lying? You are the one who’s wasting my time. If you’re just going to lie in my fucking face, next time tell me first.

            • oopster74 November 24, 2013 at 18:41

              Pick up a dictionary or a reference book, or even do a search on Wikipedia. It’s late here, and I really can’t be bothered with this right now, and nothing I saw will change your mind or help you to see things from another point of view so in not going to bother. I will add this though, just list all of the things said about feminists, then tick off which are true and which are made up bullshit, and that’s pretty much how it is for trans people too. More that’s said about us (by non trans people) is bullshit rather than fact / reality.

          • Francois Tremblay November 24, 2013 at 18:45

            I ALREADY DID, MCFLY! I LINKED YOU TO THE DAMN ENTRY WHERE I DID THAT! DID YOU NOT FUCKING READ IT? YOU ASSHOLE.

            • oopster74 November 24, 2013 at 18:48

              No, I didn’t bother reading it as I had better things to do. I don’t care how some defines themselves or other people, why should anyone? Treat each other with dignity and respect and the rest falls into place. I won’t be taking any further part in a discussion with someone who resorts to name calling to make their argument.

          • Francois Tremblay November 24, 2013 at 18:50

            Die in a fire.

            • oopster74 November 24, 2013 at 18:50

              Lovely.

          • Francois Tremblay November 24, 2013 at 18:54

            Yes, I agree that the way you wasted my fucking time to argue nothing at all and regurgitate your liberal pablum is pretty lovely. Next time, argue a point or get out. And stop saying trans is a thing unless you are ready to back it up with the bare minimum of evidence, because I’ve already shown it’s not a thing on this very blog. It is a lie propagated by womah-hating activists who are greedy for power and status.

            • oopster74 November 24, 2013 at 18:55

              Right, I was a greedy power hungry woman hater when I was 9 years old was I?

          • Francois Tremblay November 24, 2013 at 18:59

            I said ACTIVISTS. The people who are trying to gain power and status at YOUR expense, on the back of YOUR life and that of other trans people. And you’re too fucking tunnel vision and “our team” to realize that you are being sold a false bill of goods. You are weak and you disgust me. And stop posting on this thread, you’ve already posted quite enough nonsense without substance.

            Honestly I am getting tired of your shit. No, a 9 year old is not a greedy power-hungry woman-hater. A 9 year old doesn’t have a gender either, asshole. Get the fuck off this thread already.

            • oopster74 November 24, 2013 at 19:02

              I’m not being sold or buying anything. You are talking about “activists” most likely in the USA, not the UK, and I have no idea what those American activists are selling. Why don’t you do the sane you suggested I do, and read through the lines of the bullshit we are all sold.

          • Francois Tremblay November 24, 2013 at 19:07

            I already have. I gave you the link to the result. You didn’t read it. Fuck you.

            One more comment on this thread and you’re banned.

            • oopster74 November 24, 2013 at 19:08

              Ban me then.

          • Francois Tremblay November 24, 2013 at 19:13

            Goodbye asshole!

  4. DefyEntropy December 8, 2013 at 19:04

    Oh, God, what a curmudgeon git (oopster74)! He (assuming that oopster74 is biologically male) practically shoves himself into a conversation and continues to “argue” with you incessantly until a concrete piece of evidence is presented before him. Of course, at that moment, he suddenly becomes disinterested and proceeds to resort to a cop-out with, “No, I didn’t bother reading it as I had better things to do”. Can you even be this dishonest?

    Anyways, on a more serious note, I am almost finished with the logo. The general piece of work has to be cleaned up, but I’ve neglected the project for a bit in order to sort through my hectic schedule. I apologize in advance for this. Anyways, have a pleasant day.

    • Francois Tremblay December 8, 2013 at 19:23

      Oopster was a frequent commentator and I have so few of those. I tend to ban people pretty frequently, which is what happens when your blog is about five different controversial things and people will inevitably take umbrage to something you write. Anyway, I regret having to do it, but he was totally wasting my time.

Comments are closed.